Living proof that technology on a 9800 ton moving platform isn't all it's cracked up to be. A fact to which I can attest. Back in the 70's when I went aboard HMCS Provider one of my first watches at sea was as the Quarter Master in charge of helmsmen. The helm was on the bridge and unlike destroyers the helmsman got to sit at the console and drive. Well when I sat down next to the console to start my watch I noticed this very large switch and dial in the middle of the helm stand. I asked the young LS what about it and was informed that it was the automatic pilot which, once engaged would maintain a course and heading without the need for the helmsman to steer the ship. Well, to say this piqued my interest would be an understatement. So given we were in the middle of the Pacific I asked the OOW if I could engage it to see how it worked. He gave me permission and then a heading to bring the ship around to that matched our course. We engaged this devil from hell and set the sea state based on the OOW's estimation.
I then sat back to watch. Well, it was fine for the first couple of minutes and kept us on course with no issues but, as the head of the ship moved ever so imperceptibly it kept correcting itself. So, after 15 minutes of the automatic pilot correcting the ships head, we were on course but, rocking like a cork in a hurricane which led to a quick call from the CO's sea cabin asking us "what the fuck are you doing up there". We quickly disengaged the automatic pilot and resumed manual control of the helm.
Well that ended my attempt at using technology to drive a ship pretty quickly and from then on I never let any of the helmsmen on my watch use it again. So, the lesson here is, that just because it's new and technologically advanced doesn't mean it's safer or more effective than the old school mechanical methods.
![Drink up [B-o]](./images/smilies/drinkup.gif)