[ShepherdsDog]

...a quick phone call to the local constabulary should be made. Some of them are well versed in trash disposal. Pretty sure that they'd have no qualms about burying this piece of shite.

[GreenTiger]

The sooner that we can arrange for this individual to die for Allah and get his 72 raisins the better. I would suggest burying this miserable individual in a pig skin, but that would be terribly disrespectful to the pig.

[Xort]

So this was the strength that diversity would bring us. The power to murder unarmed non combatants.

[andyt]

Yes, that's right. Let's keep Canada pure and white because of a few nutcases, we're that weak.

[BRAH]

So after he kills innocent civilians he can come back to Canada and spend the rest of his life in a Federal prison at tax payers expense.

[ShepherdsDog]

Put him in GP to to show egalitarian we are.

[Xort]

andyt andyt:

Yes, that's right. Let's keep Canada pure and white because of a few nutcases, we're that weak.

The argument was that we are weak because we are white Europeans from a hugely diverse set of European backgrounds, and that we need people from outside Europe to make us strong (somehow).

[andyt]

Never heard that argument. I have heard the argument that diversity makes for a stronger country in the sense of having connections all over the world and bringing in new ideas which are not all negative. Where we went wrong tho is flooding the country with immigrants whether we needed them or not, and bringing in large numbers of people from specific regions. We did it with various European groups, and now various Asians. Bring in too many of one culture, and rather than integrate they try to recreate their culture here, even tho they left their homeland because it's better here. Limit the number of any one culture, including Europeans, that can come in every year, and they'll integrate rather than congregate. Too late now for some groups tho, already reached critical mass.

[PublicAnimalNo9]

andyt andyt:

Doesn't work that way. There is a formal process he has to go thru. But I doubt the Harper govt will expend too much sweat to help him if he asks, and I would agree with that.

Actually, it does work that way. The formal process only applies if you are actually living within Canada at the time you apply. If you renounce your citizenship while in a foreign country then you are no longer considered a Canadian. It's not up to the Canadian govt to confirm if you've gained citizenship elsewhere under that circumstance.

[andyt]

Have you got a link for that? So if I pop over to Bellingham, US, and say to joe blow I renounce Canadian citizenship, that's it? How does Canada even know about it at that point? I'm sure there would be a form you have to sign with an embassy to make it official. I'm not sure a youtube video qualifies.

[Delwin]

Sure it is, that's what Ted Cruz did, they just had a big bonfire If it was that simple, Conrad Black wouldn't have had to try to sue Chretien to obtain his British Baron Title. There is an application process.

The one, and only, way for your citizenship to be revoked is if you are found to have lied on your application.

Conservatives have tried to change this but it will not hold up to a supreme court hearing

Citizenship changes 'likely unconstitutional,' lawyers warn

$1:

Under the proposed legislation, the government would have the power to strip Canadian citizenship from dual nationals "who were members of an armed force or an organized armed group engaged in armed conflict with Canada."

The government would also have the ability to revoke citizenship from those who has been "convicted of terrorism, high treason, treason, or spying offences, depending on the sentence received."

The Proposed changes are contained in Bill C-24 which has been passed but likely will not stand in court due to constitutional conflicts.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/citizen ... -1.2627077

Edit: This law has not yet been tried in court and so it is impossible to say for certain whether it would stand up to a supreme court challenge but most experts believe it would not.

[martin14]

So, let's hope he'll do us all a favour and just get killed over there,
with the other retarded fools.

Brave Assad, can I buy you a bomb ?

[Zipperfish]

Regina Regina:

Glad he burned his passport. Hope the others did too.

My thoughts exactly. Pretty soon he'll be wanting to come home. "Well, we'd love to let you back in, but you have no passport, sorry."

[Delwin]

I agree with the idea of revoking someone's citizenship if they choose to leave and fight for a foreign enemy state/group in principal, but I could never support it in practice.

It is simply too open to abuses of power, for example, if a Canadian chose to operate as a foreign aid worker in a humanitarian capacity, it could easily be argued that they were "members" of said group. The truth is, I just don't trust our government not to be partisan in said matters. Harper has demonstrated his blind devotion to the wrong side of the conflict too many times for this to be a viable option.

[jj2424]