Thanos Thanos:
Eliminate the Wynne-factor shenanigans and Ontario could probably cut it's power costs by at least a third for the next twenty-odd years.

A third? That's a big number. How'd you arrive at it?
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
The point about energy prices is, when you have something like electricity that's in constant high demand, there's no need to lower the price, especially now that the RELIABLE part of Hydro One is in private hands with shareholders who will demand increasingly higher returns.
You can't change demand with a wave of the wand. We already pay WAY below market rate. How much of your bill would you have the government subsidize? 100%?
PA9 PA9:
Remember back in the days when supply and demand was the norm? High volume sales generally meant lower prices. But those days are gone. Now, it's gouge people for as much as they're willing to spend. And based on the rampant consumerism that's been prevalent for years now, manufacturers have zero incentive to lower their prices.
Now, take a commodity or service that is essential in today's modern world and combine it with the above mentality and I don't see hydro rates in Ontario ever stagnating, let alone dropping.
How is it "gouging" when the government is subsidizing a third of your usage?
PA9 PA9:
Like I said before, if the LPO was truly serious about reducing GHG emissions, they'd have encouraged much more R&D of wind and solar for the home and business owner. But the LPO doesn't want that. They want to "save the world" AND still be able to dip into our pockets with monthly connection and delivery fees, plus the taxes on hydro used from the grid.
Notice how they plan to "encourage" home owners to retrofit from natgas to electric? Notice how they're not encouraging anyone to get as close to 100% self-generating as they can?
Ontario had the opportunity to jump on board with cheaper, more efficient and more durable solar power units for homes and small businesses about 12-13 years ago when McGuinty was Premier. They weren't the least bit interested, on any level. Apparently, they still aren't.
Home generation is definitely something that is very interesting. But it's prohibitively expensive, in capital terms, for all but the most wealthy.
PA9 PA9:
Until Shit-For-Brains pulls her head out of her ass, she's just going to continue making Ontario a less and less attractive place to invest.
And yet businesses are starting up in Ontario. Your theory, while sound, is not supported by evidence. But again, what should we do? Subsidize more? 100%?
PA9 PA9:
Ontario could be doing things to help reduce GHGs AND make Ontario an attractive place to invest. I'm pretty sure I've mentioned it before but the technology does exist to "crack" CO2 into more base compounds and elements. All of which have a practical use. Even better, there's two different methods that produce different results.
And despite being a rather energy intensive process, with Ontario's bragged about 99.7% emission-free power generation, it's the perfect location for that type of industry. Which would also mean less power being dumped or wasted by paying someone to take the constant excess generation off our hands. THAT could possibly result in a rate reduction since we are paying for the wasted generation as well.
Myth. We make money on what we "give" away. In 2010, we exported $300M in electricity. We gave away $6M...net, we were up $294M. That's what happens in a multijurisdictional grid. It's just the way it is. But make no mistake, we do not pay people, in sum, to take our power.
$1:
“According to the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO), Ontario’s consumers benefit from (those) electricity exports, they do not subsidize them. In fact, exports reduced costs for Ontarians by approximately $300 million in 2013, according to the IESO.”
Since 2006, Ontario’s net revenue from electricity exports has been over $2 billion. These include exports to all the neighbouring jurisdictions in Canada and the USA.