Robair Robair:
According to everybody but trump, the deal was working.
Who do you mean by "everybody?" I think I can guess but I know for a fact you don't actually mean "Everybody" because I don't think the deal was working. You can't mean Netanyahu either. He had doubts:
https://www.jns.org/iran-lied-big-time- ... r-program/As did this guy:
$1:
“Iran regime conducted nuclear-weaponization activities, lied to the IAEA and to the world & hid 100,000+ documents, videos, photos with the instructions to restart a nuke weapons program at a time of its choosing,” tweeted Mark Dubowitz, CEO of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
I'm assuming the right wing website American Thinker is not on your list of 'everybody.' Of course not. But I think they make an interesting point:
$1:
The agreement gave a lot of discretion to the Iranian terrorist regime to cheat by allowing regime members to decide the nature, extent, time, and place of the inspections. It seems that the deal gave the fox the keys to the henhouse while the world and media pretend the so-called findings from the fake inspections are true and credible.
The liberal media will cheer anything in order to protect Obama's legacy, and the Europeans will cheer any deal providing them with hard cash, regardless of the dangerous consequences from a nuclear-armed Iran.
https://www.americanthinker.com/article ... _lies.htmlIs that not correct? Can you show me why not. Because if it is correct how does your "everybody" know for a fact the Iranians were honoring the deal.
Even if they were how do know that these instigations we've been seeing from Iran were not purposeful so Iran could come forward eventually after some counter-attack event they instigated then say the deal's off and claim to be the victim. You know...like they did.
Oh and I could address T's claim concerning Saddam but I won't. I'm not seeing what it has to do with this.