[Benoit]

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

filling out an insurance application, and reporting known health conditions is not called practising medicine.

Let see this application.

[DerbyX]

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

This kind of situation is a lot like a custody battle where everyone it pointing and waiving their finger at each other.

A lot of stuff can be said and twisted outside of a court room, especially when we are relying on liberal media for the facts.

When it's all said and done, the only parts that matter are the parts that are admisable in court.

Unless of course its rumours and innuendo against the Liberals.

If you were able even for a second to look beyond your rabid anti-Liberalism you would see that all the cons on her who previously convicted the Liberals based entriely on rumours or the words of a few individuals suddenly did an about face and demanded videotape evidence.

They even dismissed the evidence given by their own candidates when it didn't suit their pre-conceived notions.

pathetic.

liberal media doesn't print romours and innuendo about the has been Liberals

Sure.

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the cons is showing.

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Liberals and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a Liberal trick.

If this had been the Liberals who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there skippy.

w.r.t the adscam...

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the Liberals is showing. That is why Canada booted their ass out of government

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Conservative Party of Canada, and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a conservative trick.

If this had been the Conservatives who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there Derby-ex

You can keep trying to copy my words like a pesky younger sibling but in the end your own stupidity and political hackery is the only thing evident.


We did rely on evidence, its just that you are to much of a fuckwit to understand it.

We have all parties agreeing a meeting took place with the intent to get Cadmans support.

We have Harper on tape admitting it and Chuck on tape talking about it.

We have a CPC candidate talking very frankly and truthfully about what her husband told her, statements backed up by her daughter and son-in-law.

We have many past incidents showing that the CPC is corrupt enough tto stoop to that level.

All you have is a whiny crybaby attitude whereby you simply launch ad-hominem attacks because your aren't intelligent to deal with the fact that your corrupt party tried to bribe a dying man in order to force an election.

Nothing you say can change that.

We never seem to see you complaining about all the wild speculation by the assholes on your side as they try and blame the Liberals based on crap like forewards in books or refused meetings, something you should have been the first to attack as heresay. Thst is if you were honest enough to practice what you preach.

You aren't.

On Yer bike

[DerbyX]

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

If I pass you a napkin and tell you its worth a million dollars, is it a bribe?

If a fool interprets a worthless offer as a bribe, is it a bribe?

If the insurance policy was legit, what is the name of the carrier? Why would they issue a policy to a dying man?

They probably had no intention of ever making good on their offer.

What was Chuck going to do? Sue them for non-payment of bribe?

I can produce a worthless piece of paper for you in under an hour. If you are dumb enough to think the precluding offer is a bribe, that is your fault, not mine.

This is all an misunderstanding. The statement was just a colorful way of explaining that they weren't going to pay him a bribe. And, its a very intelligent way to explain it because you can honestly state that "nothing of value was discussed for any reason."

Your corrupt party tried to bribe a dying man in order to force an election.

Even worse they tried to do it by tricking a man into believing he could get a life-insurance payout to take care of his family.

All of this with the blessing of your benevolent dictator, Harper, who told his bagmen to offer Chuck "financial considerations".

You would think an honest person would be disgusted by this kind of dirty trick especially one that thinks he is an honest person.

Take your own advice and practice what you preach.

[ridenrain]

Lol. Now this life insurance policy, that all the experts tell us is impossible is now just a trick. According to Derby, the CPC didn't just want to bribe Chuck for his vote, but they wanted to cheat him with a bogus life insurance policy also.

All the details in the book are being denied by the principals or retracted by the publishers. The story just keeps changing, dosen't it.

On the side: We bet that Dion would retract his comments by this Friday and it looks like he won't. I'll make the $25 donation to this site tonight or tomorrow.

[Benoit]

ridenrain ridenrain:

According to Derby, the CPC didn't just want to bribe Chuck for his vote, but they wanted to cheat him with a bogus life insurance policy also.

According to ridenrain and Aging redneck, Flanagan and Finley were candid to the point of abusing unconsciously a desperate man.

[DerbyX]

ridenrain ridenrain:

Lol. Now this life insurance policy, that all the experts tell us is impossible is now just a trick. According to Derby, the CPC didn't just want to bribe Chuck for his vote, but they wanted to cheat him with a bogus life insurance policy also.

All the details in the book are being denied by the principals or retracted by the publishers. The story just keeps changing, dosen't it.

On the side: We bet that Dion would retract his comments by this Friday and it looks like he won't. I'll make the $25 donation to this site tonight or tomorrow.

I decided that since you kept trying to cast blame onto the Liberals using nothing but speculation concerning forewords and meetings that it was perfectly fair to respond likewise.

As for the stories changing, its the CPC doing that.

Donna Cadman stands by her story as does her daughter and son-in-law.

Harper stands by his story but refuses to say what "financial considerations" mean. Thats because he is guilty.

You continue to hold the opinion that it wasn't a crime and if it were then all focus should be put onto Martin for not reporting it. You left out the part where you have to prove he had fore knowledge (and prove by the same level of evidence you demanded).

Harper isn't answering because he knows damn well that his story about reimbursing election expenses is bogus as he knew full well Chuck would not have been able to fight an election much less be alive for it. He also new full well that such reimbursements are already included.

His intent from the beginning was to get Chucks support to topple the gov't. That you people can't admit it is dishonest.

Its not as if Harper has his reputation to back him up:

$1:

After all, the Prime Minister denied that his party offered Alan Riddell $50,000 to step aside as a candidate in Ottawa South. But a judge ruled that's exactly what happened.

The Prime Minister denied that his party concocted a scheme to redirect a million dollars from local ridings to the Conservatives' national campaign committee in 2006. But, Elections Canada says that's exactly what happened.

You keep focusing on the insurance policy yet the real point is simply the fact that Harper offered financial considerations for support.

In other words, he tried to bribe a dying man to force an election.

[Benoit]

DerbyX DerbyX:

As for the stories changing, its the CPC doing that.

It has stabilized. To every Liberals asking questions to Conservatives yesterday in the House of Communes, the answer endlessly repeated was: The only offer made to Mr. Cadman was to reintegrate the Conservative Party and thank you for your vote on the Budget.

[2Cdo]

DerbyX DerbyX:

You know what cdo.

You just aren't worth it.

No snappy comeback? At a loss for words? Or just realise that all you have are allegations and not one shred of evidence that anything illegal transpired.

You are as big a party hack as those you routinely accuse the same. A complete and total hypocrite.

[2Cdo]

DerbyX DerbyX:

Practice what you preach there skippy.

Good advice hypocrite.

[2Cdo]

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

This kind of situation is a lot like a custody battle where everyone it pointing and waiving their finger at each other.

A lot of stuff can be said and twisted outside of a court room, especially when we are relying on liberal media for the facts.

When it's all said and done, the only parts that matter are the parts that are admisable in court.

Unless of course its rumours and innuendo against the Liberals.

If you were able even for a second to look beyond your rabid anti-Liberalism you would see that all the cons on her who previously convicted the Liberals based entriely on rumours or the words of a few individuals suddenly did an about face and demanded videotape evidence.

They even dismissed the evidence given by their own candidates when it didn't suit their pre-conceived notions.

pathetic.

liberal media doesn't print romours and innuendo about the has been Liberals

Sure.

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the cons is showing.

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Liberals and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a Liberal trick.

If this had been the Liberals who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there skippy.

w.r.t the adscam...

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the Liberals is showing. That is why Canada booted their ass out of government

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Conservative Party of Canada, and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a conservative trick.

If this had been the Conservatives who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there Derby-ex

You can keep trying to copy my words like a pesky younger sibling but in the end your own stupidity and political hackery is the only thing evident.


We did rely on [B]allegations, its just that I am to much of a fuckwit to understand it[/b].

We have all parties agreeing a meeting took place with the intent to get Cadmans support.

We have Harper on tape admitting a meeting took place and Chuck on tape talking about it.

We have a CPC candidate talking very frankly and truthfully about what her husband allegedly told her, statements backed up by her daughter and son-in-law.

We have many past incidents showing that the liberal party is corrupt enough tto stoop to that level.

All I have is a whiny crybaby attitude whereby you simply launch attacks because you aren't stupid enough to believe the fact that your corrupt party allegedly tried to bribe a dying man in order to force an election.

Nothing I say can prove that a bribe took place.

I never seem to complain about all the wild speculation by the assholes on my side as they try and blame the Conservatives based on allegations and third party unsubstantiated rumours. Thst is if I were honest enough to practice what I preach.

I'm not!

I'm a hypocrite

Back to the med lab dummy, you're no lawyer.

[DerbyX]

Hey cdo. If you are too much of a coward to actually post anything worthwhile then piss off you troll.

At least I had the decency to honour my word unlike you or do you think I have forgotten.

BTW, you know that anger you feel whenever I insult your precious little party.

Think I should just sit by while you fuckwits insult mine?

Always remember that your corrupt party tried to bribe a dying man to force an election and you aren't man enough to admit it.

On yer bike troll.

[DerbyX]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

DerbyX DerbyX:

You know what cdo.

You just aren't worth it.

No snappy comeback? At a loss for words? Or just realise that all you have are allegations and not one shred of evidence that anything illegal transpired.

You are as big a party hack as those you routinely accuse the same. A complete and total hypocrite.

Actually I had a lomg post in the same vein but then decided you weren't worth it.

I notice you aren't going after the cons doing what you complain I do.

On yer bike hypocrite.

[2Cdo]

DerbyX DerbyX:

Hey cdo. If you are too much of a coward to actually post anything worthwhile then piss off you troll.

At least I had the decency to honour my word unlike you or do you think I have forgotten.

BTW, you know that anger you feel whenever I insult your precious little party.

Think I should just sit by while you fuckwits insult mine?

Always remember that your corrupt party tried to bribe a dying man to force an election and you aren't man enough to admit it.

On yer bike troll.

Wow, a reaction finally! Please refresh my memory about honour, a word you Liberals don't understand.

I don't feel anger towards your insults, I actually feel nothing but contempt towards hypocrites like yourself.

Your lie repeated often enough is still a lie.

Back to the lab, you aren't a lawyer.

By the way, correcting your lies is not trolling, and I'll post what I wish, when i wish. If you don't like me correcting your lies on this subject, then quit lying. Until then, have a nice day hypocrite.

[DerbyX]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Hey cdo. If you are too much of a coward to actually post anything worthwhile then piss off you troll.

At least I had the decency to honour my word unlike you or do you think I have forgotten.

BTW, you know that anger you feel whenever I insult your precious little party.

Think I should just sit by while you fuckwits insult mine?

Always remember that your corrupt party tried to bribe a dying man to force an election and you aren't man enough to admit it.

On yer bike troll.

Wow, a reaction finally! Please refresh my memory about honour, a word you Liberals don't understand.

I don't feel anger towards your insults, I actually feel nothing but contempt towards hypocrites like yourself.

Your lie repeated often enough is still a lie.

Back to the lab, you aren't a lawyer.

By the way, correcting your lies is not trolling, and I'll post what I wish, when i wish. If you don't like me correcting your lies on this subject, then quit lying. Until then, have a nice day hypocrite.

Since you aren't even smart enough to remember your own words let me refresh you.

http://www.canadaka.net/modules.php?nam ... c&start=60

I understand that you are to much of a crybaby to be a man of your word and to much of a hypocrite to police your own so instead of making even an attempt at an intelligent post all you can manage is crying like a little girl with a skinned knee.

It just to bad that your own parties MPs considered it a bribe and its to bad you aren't smart enough to understand it.

I expect nothing less then a hoghschool dropout who joined the military because his other career choice of working in McDonalds suddenly raised their standards.

Off you go now troll.

[Benoit]

In petty politics, whistleblowers are hated.