|
Author |
Topic Options
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:26 pm
If Anonymous doesn't exhist why are they cowering in the corner pissing themselves after mouthing off about exposing the Zeta Mexican Drug Cartel? $1: Hacker Collective ‘Anonymous’ Goes After Mexican Drug Cartel Read more: http://techland.time.com/2011/10/31/hac ... z1qS8mPTkVMust be the use of the term collective that makes them so appealing to the left. It's really to bad they took the threats from the cartel seriously because it would have been great fun to see some whacko mexicans shooting up middle america's basements along with the self indulgent spawn that inhabit them..
|
Posts: 8738
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:43 pm
RUEZ RUEZ: Curtman Curtman: Anonymous isn't even a group. You put a goofy mask on, an audio filter, webcam, and poof.. You're Anonymous. "They" don't exist, that's why you can't find them.
Dumb. Take away the name anonymous and "they" are still out there breaking the law. But are they breaking the law in regards to Poor Old Vic? If they are then investigate away, but if they are not breaking the law than you and Vickie should just step away from the computer.
|
Posts: 8738
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:28 pm
Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy: If Anonymous doesn't exhist why are they cowering in the corner pissing themselves after mouthing off about exposing the Zeta Mexican Drug Cartel? .. So, your saying you wouldn't be scared if a Mexican Drug Cartel was mad at you. It's times like this when I wish we could use the smilies on mobile. I really would like access to "rolling eyes."
|
Posts: 21611
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:35 pm
Last edited by Public_Domain on Sun Feb 23, 2025 8:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:42 pm
fifeboy fifeboy: Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy: If Anonymous doesn't exhist why are they cowering in the corner pissing themselves after mouthing off about exposing the Zeta Mexican Drug Cartel? .. So, your saying you wouldn't be scared if a Mexican Drug Cartel was mad at you. It's times like this when I wish we could use the smilies on mobile. I really would like access to "rolling eyes." Of course I would, but then again I don't live in the realm of make believe and think because my "collective" doesn't have a name I'm safe to do what I want with no consequences. But then again, since they don't exhist why should they be afraid. It's not like anyone can find out their names, addresses and places of employment cause they're super secret. The reality is that they're a bunch of kids going around stirring the pot and when they got called on it by someone who was willing to use physical force to stop their self indulgent games they shit themselves and quit playing immediately.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:44 pm
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada: The reason they can't be stopped is because they are anybody. And they can say anything, and still be Anonymous. There is no control or say over anything, it's just a decentralized mass group that is in individual sects. Maybe you can take down a few groups of individuals at a time, but not "Anonymous". If they can say anything they want with impunity why didn't they actually expose the Zeta Cartel like they promised?
|
Posts: 15102
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:59 pm
fifeboy fifeboy: RUEZ RUEZ: Curtman Curtman: Anonymous isn't even a group. You put a goofy mask on, an audio filter, webcam, and poof.. You're Anonymous. "They" don't exist, that's why you can't find them.
Dumb. Take away the name anonymous and "they" are still out there breaking the law. But are they breaking the law in regards to Poor Old Vic? If they are then investigate away, but if they are not breaking the law than you and Vickie should just step away from the computer. What a stupid thing to say. I don't know that they are breaking the law, I suppose that's why he's calling for an investigation. On the other hand do you really think it's appropriate that an anonymous group of hackers, who most likely aren't even from this country, intimidate one of our elected leaders? Now we have the NDP who were allegedly victims of a denial of service attack, laying the blame at the feet of the Conservatives. I would love to know what group of children supports the Conservatives enough that they would do that? I doubt any NDP supporter gave it two seconds of thought. It's just easier to throw out accusations.
|
Posts: 21611
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:17 pm
Last edited by Public_Domain on Sun Feb 23, 2025 8:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:34 pm
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada: Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy: Mr_Canada Mr_Canada: The reason they can't be stopped is because they are anybody. And they can say anything, and still be Anonymous. There is no control or say over anything, it's just a decentralized mass group that is in individual sects. Maybe you can take down a few groups of individuals at a time, but not "Anonymous". If they can say anything they want with impunity why didn't they actually expose the Zeta Cartel like they promised? Cause that particular group of Anonymous comically felt afraid of being discovered. It's kinda funny that they show more fear for the underground lawless tyrants discovering their identities than the professional law agencies they usually tempt. You're probably right but it'd be my guess that if Vic Toews really wanted to get the names of who leaked his dirty laundry all he'd have to do is give a quick call to Nuevo Laredo and for the right price he'd have his answers.
|
Posts: 21665
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 1:05 am
I don;t have much respect for Anonymous. Juts because I don't have much respect for anyone who espouses lofty goals but is too scard to stand behind them.
That said, this is politics. Vic Toews divorce proceedings are easy for anyone to see. The media could well have reported on it, but for their own reasons choose not to do so, generally, in Canada. If there's one thing that the Conservatives in general, and Toews in particular, have down pat it's outrage. It's Toews's natural state, so his response to the incident is predictable.
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:51 am
Zipperfish Zipperfish: I don;t have much respect for Anonymous. Juts because I don't have much respect for anyone who espouses lofty goals but is too scard to stand behind them.
That said, this is politics. Vic Toews divorce proceedings are easy for anyone to see. The media could well have reported on it, but for their own reasons choose not to do so, generally, in Canada. If there's one thing that the Conservatives in general, and Toews in particular, have down pat it's outrage. It's Toews's natural state, so his response to the incident is predictable. They did locally. The adultery and the election fraud were reported by local media. The in-and-out scheme was invented here in Manitoba. They went on to implement it federally when Vic was prohibited from provincial politics forcing him to join the Harperites.
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:05 am
A) The cartels can be policed by the government and the police and our armies.
B) The Government and the police and the armies should be policed by someone. And I'm very happy to see the Wikileaks and the Anonymous groups and the Hackers are up for that challenge.
Or we can just be sheep and believe that Vic Toews and George Bush and all the Brian Mulroneys of the world are all good people just interested in serving the public and will make sure that our money is spent to benefit all the taxpayers, and our foreign policy is in line with our laws.
Toews is a fucking scumbag, don't forget he called all of us "child pornographer accomplices" when we told him we didn't want to give up our privacy rights. Douches like Toews are going to be the guys that Anonymous expose. I appreciate that. Keep up the good work!
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:38 am
Thanos Thanos: Given the sociopathic nature of the 4chan/Anon/Julian Assange crowd I'm genuinely surprised that Anonymous didn't release the 75 names anyway. These are the people who could have cared less about how many lives could have been lost by Wikileaks releasing stolen unadultered information to the media so why would 750 deaths from drug cartel retaliation even come close to bothering them? Remember, this is the awful truth of the hacktivist community, aka the worst sewer on the internet:  4chan has little to do with Anonymous anymore. It might have been the breeding ground for it's start, but the people who are actually doing a lot of the "hacktivism" probably hate 4chan.
|
Posts: 8738
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:06 am
Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy: fifeboy fifeboy: Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy: If Anonymous doesn't exhist why are they cowering in the corner pissing themselves after mouthing off about exposing the Zeta Mexican Drug Cartel? .. So, your saying you wouldn't be scared if a Mexican Drug Cartel was mad at you. It's times like this when I wish we could use the smilies on mobile. I really would like access to "rolling eyes." Of course I would, but then again I don't live in the realm of make believe and here I thought you voted Conservative. My mistake. $1: The reality is that they're a bunch of kids going around stirring the pot and when they got called on it by someone who was willing to use physical force to stop their self indulgent games they shit themselves and quit playing immediately. kids these days. I hear the Syrian government had problems with them too
|
Posts: 8738
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:22 am
RUEZ RUEZ: What a stupid thing to say. I don't know that they are breaking the law, I suppose that's why he's calling for an investigation. On the other hand do you really think it's appropriate that an anonymous group of hackers, who most likely aren't even from this country, intimidate one of our elected leaders? Now we have the NDP who were allegedly victims of a denial of service attack, laying the blame at the feet of the Conservatives. I would love to know what group of children supports the Conservatives enough that they would do that? I doubt any NDP supporter gave it two seconds of thought. It's just easier to throw out accusations. Like I said, if it appears that a law was broken then investigate and charge. But I suspect Steve has already looked into it and the CPC lawyers gave him the wrong answer. But I'm a fair guy, let's call a Royal commission and if they can't find anything perhaps they can investigate voter suppression in the last election.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
[ 45 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests |
|
|