andyt andyt:
Oh, stop. You're just making my point for me now.
Because of this one right?
$1:
Even after the grooming scandal was exposed, a serving councillor told the new inquiry he believed the Asian men accused of grooming girls for sex had in reality been ‘fooled’ by girls aged 14 and 15 whose clothing and make-up made them ‘look more adult’
Because that guy was so desperate for an excuse all he could do was say over and over again 'those tricky British slags made me think it's OK to bang 11 year old British girls. Kind of like what you do, right?'
But admit it - that one point is all you heard of the 15 or so points isn't it?
Yes, Andy some of you Progressive types seem to think a valid excuse for the abuse of children is if some of them look slutty to you. To you and yours that's an excuse. Agreed.
I'll give you that one.
But it doesn't explain why whistleblowers were attacked for trying to come public with the information that most of the abusers were Muslims.
It doesn't explain how studies by professionals can come to the conclusion fears of being called racist are what caused the suppression and purges of any who wanted to go public with the reveal thousands of British kids were being groomed for sex by gangs and those gangs were made up almost entirely of Pakistani Muslims.
It doesn't explain why a police officer who was active during the period of the offences would say, "
there is no doubt that in Rotherham, this has been a problem with Pakistani men for years and years. People were scared of being called racist.’"But yes Andy you are correct. You and yours do seem to think your belief these underaged girls were all sluts makes the abuse of thousands of them by Muslim Pakistani gangs OK. In fact by some unfathomable sort of Prog logic you seem to believe that because you can believe these kids were sluts we now have to stop noticing almost all the abusers were Pakistani Muslims.
They were Pakistani Muslims though, so we have to ask why.