|
Author |
Topic Options
|
Posts: 19920
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 12:40 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson: fifeboy fifeboy: BartSimpson BartSimpson: They're helping to elect a Republican super-majority to Congress in 2020 and they're doing their part to help Republicans gain political control of more Democrat states like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Missouri. They're also getting a head start on re-electing President Trump in 2020. ![Drink up [B-o]](./images/smilies/drinkup.gif) Won't that depend more on Trump actually doing a good job? Both. I expect Trump to do as President what he's done for the past forty years as a private citizen. And that will be good news for the economy and more people will have access to better paying jobs and we'll see a reversal of the trend towards greater poverty as we've seen since 2008. And as these people protest the man when the public sees more money in their pockets they'll help to re-elect him just the same as the anti-Reagan protests in 1984 helped to re-elect Reagan and by a greater margin than he was elected with in the 1980. And tha would be what? Cause bankruptcies across the land?
|
Posts: 65472
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 12:44 pm
You may wish to reconsider your opinion of the man given that he defied almost every single liberal media poll and pundit of the past 18 months.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 12:48 pm
Public_Domain Public_Domain: It's a shame that the right to write a name on a piece of paper once every four years means you have no right to protest outside of that single day. Once every 1,457 days, thats it! Any other day, sit down and shut the fuck up!
Gotta exercise that right while they still have it. Sorry but that's a cop out. They have the right of "peaceful" protest anytime they want. The problem is that they probably wouldn't have had to protest if they'd have gotten off their fucking asses and cast a ballot. But hey, whining is alot more fun than participating in democracy.  Why were there no protests when Obama got elected and why did these same non voting, whining wing nuts keep telling everyone to give him a chance when he first got elected? Seems to me that before they protest they should at least give the new President a chance to make and act on policy. As it is now is they're just a bunch of self indulgent asshats who think the world revolves around their little brown grommets.
Last edited by Freakinoldguy on Thu Nov 10, 2016 12:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posts: 33691
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 12:49 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson: You may wish to reconsider your opinion of the man given that he defied almost every single liberal media poll and pundit of the past 18 months. They won't change, the shilling and whining will just get louder and more high pitched. Asking Liberals to behave like adults is impossible for them. More tears, bitches, I'm loving it. ![Drool [drool]](./images/smilies/droolies.GIF)
|
Posts: 14139
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 12:51 pm
Public_Domain Public_Domain: It's a shame that the right to write a name on a piece of paper once every four years means you have no right to protest outside of that single day. Once every 1,457 days, thats it! Any other day, sit down and shut the fuck up!
Gotta exercise that right while they still have it. American democrat supportrs protesting the democratic process. The old Soviet hold-overs in Russia must be having a good laugh right about now. Look, it's one thing to protest a President's actions as President. It's another thing entirely to protest the outcome of a vote because it didn't turn out the way you wanted. Think of the irony of what you posted. There were even schools that shut down to protest the outcome of the vote. Not a lot of people attending school are old enough to vote and yet they're protesting the outcome. Although it's more likely they were enjoying a day off school while their teachers whined like little bitches who didn't get their way.
|
Posts: 14139
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 12:56 pm
andyt andyt: They may never do that, America ain't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. And since this was a race vote, they'll probably keep on voting right. Wow, if that's the case there must be a SHIT load of stupid Blacks and Hispanics in the US. At least according to your dumbassed, hare-brained comment.
|
Posts: 19920
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 12:58 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson: You may wish to reconsider your opinion of the man given that he defied almost every single liberal media poll and pundit of the past 18 months. On that regard I have. But it doesn't change the fact that he has at least six bankruptcies to his name, is about to go on trial for running a scam university, and penchant for cheating people whenever possible.
|
Posts: 53111
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 1:01 pm
Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy: The problem is that they probably wouldn't have had to protest if they'd have gotten off their fucking asses and cast a ballot. But hey, whining is alot more fun than participating in democracy.  How do you know they didn't? You are making some assumptions here for which there is no evidence. PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9: Look, it's one thing to protest a President's actions as President. It's another thing entirely to protest the outcome of a vote because it didn't turn out the way you wanted. Who are any of us to tell another how they are to use their rights? There were some documented shenanigans, like voting machines changing votes on people. Whether they voted or not, who they voted for or didn't - rights are still rights. Whether they protest unfair voting, or election outcome, or just because they hate Thursdays; that is their right!
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 1:07 pm
Trump Voter Attacked by Group
|
Posts: 14139
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 1:13 pm
xerxes xerxes: BartSimpson BartSimpson: You may wish to reconsider your opinion of the man given that he defied almost every single liberal media poll and pundit of the past 18 months. On that regard I have. But it doesn't change the fact that he has at least six bankruptcies to his name, is about to go on trial for running a scam university, and penchant for cheating people whenever possible. As opposed to someone who completely bungled their appointment as SoS, operates a fraudulent "charity" and steals money from low income, one time donors to her campaign via wire fraud? Not to mention the people who had real dirt on Clinton kept dying under questionable circumstances. I won't even bother getting into Bill's little impromptu meeting with the AG that saw the FBI drop their initial investigation post haste.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 1:15 pm
DrCaleb DrCaleb: Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy: The problem is that they probably wouldn't have had to protest if they'd have gotten off their fucking asses and cast a ballot. But hey, whining is alot more fun than participating in democracy.  How do you know they didn't? You are making some assumptions here for which there is no evidence. PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9: Look, it's one thing to protest a President's actions as President. It's another thing entirely to protest the outcome of a vote because it didn't turn out the way you wanted. Who are any of us to tell another how they are to use their rights? There were some documented shenanigans, like voting machines changing votes on people. Whether they voted or not, who they voted for or didn't - rights are still rights. Whether they protest unfair voting, or election outcome, or just because they hate Thursdays; that is their right! Given that US voter turnout is normally the lowest in the developed world it's a pretty safe bet to say that some or even alot of those people didn't bother to cast a ballot which makes them just what I said they were. $1: New U.S. Census data released on July 19 confirm what we already knew about American elections: Voter turnout in the United States is among the lowest in the developed world. Only 42 percent of Americans voted in the 2014 midterm elections, the lowest level of voter turnout since 1978. And midterm voters tend to be older, whiter and richer than the general population. The aggregate number is important but turnout among different groups is even more crucial. http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2 ... s-why.htmlAnd yes there were shenanigans with the voting machines but it might not only be the people you assumed who were doing it. https://nworeport.me/2016/10/29/voting- ... is-rigged/
|
Posts: 21611
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 1:18 pm
Last edited by Public_Domain on Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posts: 53111
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 1:32 pm
Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy: Given that US voter turnout is normally the lowest in the developed world it's a pretty safe bet to say that some or even alot of those people didn't bother to cast a ballot which makes them just what I said they were. $1: New U.S. Census data released on July 19 confirm what we already knew about American elections: Voter turnout in the United States is among the lowest in the developed world. Only 42 percent of Americans voted in the 2014 midterm elections, the lowest level of voter turnout since 1978. And midterm voters tend to be older, whiter and richer than the general population. The aggregate number is important but turnout among different groups is even more crucial. http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2 ... s-why.htmlCircular logic. Because voter turnout is down does not mean that those same people protest elections, just because you say they do! Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy: And yes there were shenanigans with the voting machines but it might not only be the people you assumed who were doing it. https://nworeport.me/2016/10/29/voting- ... is-rigged/Assumes facts not in evidence.
|
Posts: 21611
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 1:38 pm
Last edited by Public_Domain on Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posts: 9445
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 1:40 pm
The Left wants to do away with the Electoral College because it didn't work in their favor. What a bunch of hypocrital, whiny, safe space bitches. 
|
|
Page 3 of 12
|
[ 167 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests |
|
|