[Newsbot]

Title: Israeli navy intercepts Egypt-bound ship with arms
Category: World
Posted By: Hyack
Date: 2011-03-15 16:22:48

[GreenTiger]

Score one for the Israeli navy.

[Freakinoldguy]

And of course the UN will claim it was humanitarian aid destined for the poor and starving Palestinians and censure Israel, yet again.

[ShepherdsDog]

let them eat yellow cake.

[ShepherdsDog]

every time you sand bandits attacked the Israeli people , Israel grew. I have to ask, is ass halal, because you certainly seem to enjoy the taste of yours being served to you?

[ShepherdsDog]

When they are carrying illegal arms and drugs. Civilized societies do it all the time.

[Thanos]

They should have let the ship dock and then dropped a daisycutter right on top of it. The laughs emanating from the WHAMMMMMMMMMMMO! effect would have been awesome.

[Gunnair]

"MrAbbas" wrote:

$1:

So, you are saying that we should start raiding ships all around the world because different countries suspect other countries of illegally transfer arms and drugs?

If those ships are transporting illegal weapons (gun running) or illegal drugs, then... yes.

$1:

who made Israel, US or any other "civilized society" the world police?

The world tends to vote them in to do the shitty jobs no one else will. Watching what's happening in Libya?

$1:

Second, how do you justify "civilized societies" attacking Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine?

Afghanistan supported attacks on the US. Iraq was foolishly invaded, made worse by the shitting of the bed in the weeks after Saddam's sorting out. Palestine? Really?

$1:

Let me guess, they have the right to invade as they will too?

Who?

[Gunnair]

"MrAbbas"

$1:

If those ships are transporting illegal weapons (gun running) or illegal drugs, then... yes.

$1:

Well, the problem is that the ones that are confiscating the arms are the only ones calling them illegal. So, now they are the judges, jury and executioner of every matter in the world. (Israel)

True. It seems a case of might means right.

$1:

Weapons or no weapons, all countries have the right to build up arms to protect themselves so they can't be bullied like most middle eastern countries are.

Which middle eastern countries are being bullied? Libya? Egypt? Yemen? Bahrain?

$1:

The world tends to vote them in to do the shitty jobs no one else will. Watching what's happening in Libya?

$1:

What world? Libyan people aren't asking "US" or "ISRAEL" to provide cover, they are asking for closed airspace from their neighbors. Nato decided to take the lead because they had no use for Ghaddafi anymore.

This makes little sense. Libyan rebels want support - no fly zone, weapons and ammo, logistical help. Don't see the Arab league tripping over itself to help.

$1:

Afghanistan supported attacks on the US. Iraq was foolishly invaded, made worse by the shitting of the bed in the weeks after Saddam's sorting out. Palestine? Really?

$1:

Who?

$1:

US, ISRAEL or any other country invading any other country. I am again aggression of all form.

Pretty aggresive pacifist, aren't you?

[Gunnair]

"MrAbbas"

$1:

True. It seems a case of might means right.

$1:

It sure does, which is why we should stay quite when the both sides show their might in different forms.

But you're not. You're complaining when Israel flexes its might.

$1:

Which middle eastern countries are being bullied? Libya? Egypt? Yemen? Bahrain?

$1:

Yes, all those regimes are supported by US and have been support for many years. Not Libya but Egypt / Yemen / Bahrain.

And?

$1:

This makes little sense. Libyan rebels want support - no fly zone, weapons and ammo, logistical help. Don't see the Arab league tripping over itself to help.

$1:

Actually Arab League offered to provide a no fly zone and it was turned down by "us military" echelon. Libyan rebels do need all those but not from the western countries. I would suggest to leave them at their own devices otherwise this will be another conflict with no end.

They wanted a no fly zone, sure. Did they offer to do it? I didn't see that anywhere.

$1:

Pretty aggresive pacifist, aren't you?

$1:

sometimes peace needs to be as aggressive as the violence its trying to counter.

Hmmm.... so you do support aggresion. Just clarifying here.

[2Cdo]

Who is this MrAbbas you are talking with? Has he already been banned and had his posts removed?

[Gunnair]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Who is this MrAbbas you are talking with? Has he already been banned and had his posts removed?

I recall him from a while back. He's a fairly rabid anti-Israeli pro-Arab fella who seems to get himself banned after a time of showing up.

[2Cdo]

Gunnair Gunnair:

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Who is this MrAbbas you are talking with? Has he already been banned and had his posts removed?

I recall him from a while back. He's a fairly rabid anti-Israeli pro-Arab fella who seems to get himself banned after a time of showing up.

I remember him now. Started out pretending to be a "moderate" Muslim but quickly revealed his true beliefs.

[Gunnair]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Gunnair Gunnair:

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Who is this MrAbbas you are talking with? Has he already been banned and had his posts removed?

I recall him from a while back. He's a fairly rabid anti-Israeli pro-Arab fella who seems to get himself banned after a time of showing up.

I remember him now. Started out pretending to be a "moderate" Muslim but quickly revealed his true beliefs.

Yes, that's the guy. I think he and Bart have a little thing going on too. They're like the twelve year old puppy-lovers at the school dance - lots of slow dancing and hanging around in the darkened corner.