 Ezra Levant's libel appeal denied by Supreme CourtLaw & Order | 207078 hits | Jun 09 6:18 am | Posted by: DrCaleb  The Supreme Court of Canada will not hear an appeal filed by outspoken political commentator Ezra Levant over a 2014 libel judgment against him.Commentsview comments in forum You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
Pretty much sums up Ezra and the "Rebel".
"I find that the defendant's dominant motive in these blog posts was ill will, and that his repeated failure to take even basic steps to check his facts showed a reckless disregard for the truth,"
Pretty much sums up Ezra and the "Rebel".
http://www.680news.com/2017/06/07/porte ... bel-media/
"I find that the defendant's dominant motive in these blog posts was ill will, and that his repeated failure to take even basic steps to check his facts showed a reckless disregard for the truth,"
Pretty much sums up Ezra and the "Rebel".
http://www.680news.com/2017/06/07/porte ... bel-media/
"You MUST endorse me and any political opinion I provide or else you're 'blacklisting a Jewish company'!
Gosh Ezra, who is "playing the race card" now?
What a fucking loser. That's a new level of desperate, even for him.
"I find that the defendant's dominant motive in these blog posts was ill will, and that his repeated failure to take even basic steps to check his facts showed a reckless disregard for the truth,"
Pretty much sums up Ezra and the "Rebel".
"The defendant makes a general assertion that none of the words complained of were defamatory due to the defendant's reputation," she wrote. "There is, however, ample evidence before me demonstrating express malice on the part of the defendant."
Levant also appeared to have little regard for the facts, Matheson found.
"He did little or no fact-checking regarding the posts complained of, either before or after their publication....and with one exception, when he learned that he got his facts wrong, he made no corrections," she wrote.
The fact that Levant himself is a lawyer ought to have made him aware of the "serious ramifications" of his words on Awan's reputation, Matheson added.
"Yet, at trial, he repeatedly tried to minimize his mistakes and his lack of diligence," she wrote.
Pretty much sums up the Deplorables and their sleazy tactics in general.
No wonder so many Rebel 'reporters' have been seen at Milo's parties.
In Canada you're going to lose that battle more than you win it, but every once in awhile he has won one or two the regressive left and their corporate media don't dance around celebrating so fewer people hear about them.
With this one he was fined for calling an anti-semite an anti-semite, and the case he is publicising out of it is not Porter airlines. It's a 70 something year old lady who is being lawfared by the same guy who sued him for putting Christian crosses in her garden.
Personally I think it's Canada's Social Justice lawfare enabling judges who should be named and shamed. Not Ezra.