 2 Kamloops teens sent to hospital after smoking joint, police say ..."Because of the adverse reactions experienced by the students, there exists a possibility that something in addition to marijuana may have been present in the joint," he said...Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
Who voted on this?
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
An excellent case for legalization, control what goes and doesn't go into the stuff.
How? You think legal ciggarettes can't be tampered with?
linky no worky...
Huh.
Try this: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/cbc/vancouve ... king_joint
An excellent case for legalization, control what goes and doesn't go into the stuff.
How? You think legal ciggarettes can't be tampered with?
Why not? You made the argument that legalizing pot would get rid of this problem. I think we all know that legal products can be tampered with. Or weren't you around during the 80's Tylenol scare?
Why not?Because it's WEAK.
You made the argument that legalizing pot would get rid of this problem.
I think we all know that legal products can be tampered with.
Or weren't you around during the 80's Tylenol scare?
Why not?Because it's WEAK. It's no weaker then your argument. Two children were hurt while doing something illegal so naturally let's legalize their activity.
It's no weaker then your argument. Two children were hurt while doing something illegal so naturally let's legalize their activity.
My argument is to legalize , maybe that's the part you're having trouble with? You could legalize pot without making it legal for anyone under 18 to smoke the stuff.
It's no weaker then your argument. Two children were hurt while doing something illegal so naturally let's legalize their activity.
My argument is to legalize , maybe that's the part you're having trouble with? You could legalize pot without making it legal for anyone under 18 to smoke the stuff.
It's you that is having trouble understanding. Legalizing pot won't prevent someone from tampering with it. What part don't you understand?
If regulations aren't going to stop people from putting goofy shit in the pot they sell, why have any regulations on food? Or alchohol? Or anything else we ingest? If it isn't going to stop breweries from selling us cheap fire water laced with cyanide?