NATO pledges probe of deadly Afghan air strike

Momerghany, I bet your wife walks 10 paces behind you, and is uneducated. And you like it that way.

You know this how, and what does it have to do with the story?

I just get the feeling from all his pro-taliban rhetoric. Read his posts Raydan.

I don't think that a lot of us here go and read the story comments, although I could be wrong.

It took me a while to figure out who Momerghany was and what you meant by: and maybe very few people here understood.

Other CKA posters may say I'm wrong but you should limit your comments to the story and/or what others post here.

Show me the rules to back up your opinion. And the whole point of having a forum is to agree or disagree with other contributors comments. I disagree with you dictating what people should or shouldn't do.

Your original post just seemed a bit random, gonavy47. I don't mean to speak for Ray, but rather than your one-sentence flippant comment (well, you had two sort-of sentences, neither of which was a correct sentence by itself -- so much for calling others uneducated ), you could have given us some background, context or some details. I didn't know who the hell Momerghany was either without doing some searching on my own. It's not a case of "dictating what people should or shouldn't do". It's about making your contributions coherent.

Yea, I don't get it either.

Must be a seamen thing...

Bloody fish-heads!

Seems that not many people read the story comments (there are 89 pages of them).
As it stands, nobody except for me (it took me a while) and Lemmy (who had to do some searching) figured it out.
I gave you one suggestion (I did not dictate), Lemmy gave you another one.
For the record, Lemmy's said it better.
So to sum it all up, just try to be clearer in you future posts.

One last thing, there are no rules to back up my opinion, it's an opinion.

Exactly. And oh, forgive me if some of you actually had to put some effort into your research. As far as being flippant, my comments had a basis in researching the culture of the commentator. The last thing that it represented was a lack of education. I believe "bloody fishheads" and "must be a seamen thing" to qualify as flippant remarks. Is that coherent enough for you?

Dude, I was offering some friendly, objective, 3rd-party advice, and a good hearted jab (so referenced ). You can take my advice or not, or go piss up a rope...no biggie with me, but getting hostile's gonna get you no where. And if you want to bandy about your education, you'd better be able to form a correct sentence; people in glass houses and all.

Lemmy, Dude, you were very condescending in your comments, so I took offense. As far as being hostile, your last comment is just that: (piss up a rope). I have never bandied about my education, just defended myself against your insult. You may take offense to this, but, I really don't give a rat's ass about whether you think I'm educated or not. However as you don't know me ,I would suggest in the future you ignore my comments as it causes you such distress. I'll be sure to ignore yours. Deal?

Boo hoo. Never met a fish-head who couldn't take and give a bit of stick. Your a bit thin skinned for a real sailor. Too long in the barrel?