Commons to vote today on bill to kill long gun registry

Let us be diplomatic about this...

You may as well cross the floor now, you good for nothing pieces of raw sewage.

Opposing a civilized idea like the long gun registry is NOT a Liberal/liberal value. If you think it is, you are not a liberal (or Liberal).

If you "choose" to support the Conservative Bill, here's what you can count on from real Liberals:

1) We will not attend your events

2) We will not attend events that you are attending (we'll be starting a Facebook group, etc., to encourage boycotting said events)

3) We will ensure someone runs against you in your riding

4) We will ensure a mailing campaign begins to oppose every statement you make in the house.

Face it. If you're "for" killing the registry (and dozens of Canadians in the process), because of the whims of your constituency, then you may as well follow all those "whims": right to choose, same sex marriage, etc. We know your riding probably opposes those liberal ideals as well.

Bottom line: Get the F outta the party today, before we work to drive you out. You make us sick you f'n "liberal's of convenience"/opportunists...

Signed:

Lifelong "true" Liberals.

Empowering snipers: Opposition MPs to help make dangerous weapons disappear

This is a 50 calibre sniper rifle.

In Canada, this rifle can be sold to anybody with a firearms license.

A 50 caliber rifle will penetrate concrete and is accurate at well over a mile.

It is not a hunting rifle.

There are few ranges secure enough to even fire a 50 cal rifle.

It isn't just sporting rifles and shotguns that fall under Bill C-391's spell.

If the Bill passes, large caliber sniper rifles will no longer be registered.

And Jack Layton and Michael Ignatieff seem OK with their MPs voting to make war weapons disappear from the registry.

Does this make sense to anybody?

"ridenrain" said
Oh dear.. This has some petty upset...

"Guy_Fawkes" said
I never saw the point of the long gun registry, and still dont.

"BartSimpson" said
I've never understood the opposition to .50 rifles in the first place. They're bloody awful heavy, they're brutally expensive anymore, one cartridge runs you $10 these days, and no one is going to hide a rifle that's five to six feet long in their jeans. Oh, and the utter nonsense about someone using one of these rifles to shoot down an aircraft is the product of Hollywood - it has NEVER been done in real life.

"BartSimpson" said
I've never understood the opposition to .50 rifles in the first place. They're bloody awful heavy, they're brutally expensive anymore, one cartridge runs you $10 these days, and no one is going to hide a rifle that's five to six feet long in their jeans. Oh, and the utter nonsense about someone using one of these rifles to shoot down an aircraft is the product of Hollywood - it has NEVER been done in real life.