![]() Crown wants three-year sentence for baby assaultLaw & Order | 207018 hits | May 07 7:56 pm | Posted by: wildrosegirl Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Who voted on this?
|
Let me correct this: "He should be hit over the back of the head repeatedly with a brick"
For the rest of his life, until he dies... as the baby did.
Let me correct this: "He should be hit over the back of the head repeatedly with a brick"
For the rest of his life, until he dies... as the baby did.
The baby didn't. He is 4 now.
Let me correct this: "He should be hit over the back of the head repeatedly with a brick"
For the rest of his life, until he dies... as the baby did.
The baby didn't. He is 4 now.
Ooops.. had this little guy confused with another one. There's so many these days.
I guess I'm ignorant of context/precedent here, but 3 years seems awfully low to me.
I guess I'm ignorant of context/precedent here, but 3 years seems awfully low to me.
Well, people have killed and gotten less time. One woman in BC got two years house arrest for manslaughter, another, native, woman got 3 years probation. Of the 3 guys who kicked a highschool student into a come, ruining his budding golf career, the stiffest sentence was 2 years. The underage boys got a few months house arrest. I'm sure I can think of more.
At least in this case the guy pled guilty, had no prior record and the baby will be fine.