 Canadian woman escapes from Saudi ArabiaMisc CDN | 207241 hits | May 09 9:15 pm | Posted by: wildrosegirl  After three years, Nazia Quazi is free of her father�s control.
The young Muslim woman � a Canadian citizen who studied at the University of Ottawa � was trapped in Saudi Arabia because of the country�s male guardianship system that means the father spCommentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
I seriously wondered why we didn't invade Saudi Arabia instead of Afghanistan or at the very least Iraq. Most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi Arabian, Saudi Arabia is ass-backwards with its laws and institutions and is incredibly corrupt. Afghanistan I can sorta understand, but if we had to invade another Middle-Eastern country, it should've been Saudi Arabia.
Not as long as the House of Saud is buddy buddy with the United States.
I seriously wondered why we didn't invade Saudi Arabia instead of Afghanistan or at the very least Iraq. Most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi Arabian, Saudi Arabia is ass-backwards with its laws and institutions and is incredibly corrupt. Afghanistan I can sorta understand, but if we had to invade another Middle-Eastern country, it should've been Saudi Arabia.
Not as long as the House of Saud is buddy buddy with the United States.
Absolutely. As soon as the oil runs out, it's a different matter, but until then, it's one long suck.
What an ass backward religion.
I've been saying that for about 20 years.
A Canadian was held prisoner in the bloody Saudi Arabia for three years and no one did shit?
That's right, and for two reasons:
1. They got oil.
2. No one wants to be accused of being insensitive to the Muslims.
I seriously wondered why we didn't invade Saudi Arabia instead of Afghanistan or at the very least Iraq. Most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi Arabian, Saudi Arabia is ass-backwards with its laws and institutions and is incredibly corrupt. Afghanistan I can sorta understand, but if we had to invade another Middle-Eastern country, it should've been Saudi Arabia.
Concur. The terrorists might be holed up in Afghan and, yeah, they may have had coffee with Saddam, but they're almost 100% funded by the Saudis and that means members of the royal family.
1. They got oil.
We have more than enough, shouldn't be of concern to us.
2. No one wants to be accused of being insensitive to the Muslims.
Wouldn't bother me one bit.
1. They got oil.
We have more than enough, shouldn't be of concern to us.
2. No one wants to be accused of being insensitive to the Muslims.
Wouldn't bother me one bit.
I seriously wondered why we didn't invade Saudi Arabia instead of Afghanistan or at the very least Iraq. Most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi Arabian, Saudi Arabia is ass-backwards with its laws and institutions and is incredibly corrupt. Afghanistan I can sorta understand, but if we had to invade another Middle-Eastern country, it should've been Saudi Arabia.
1) We told Afghanistan to hand over Bin Ladin they said fuck off
2) Saudi Arabia aside from it's billions of faults, does attempt to persecute terrorist.
3) They are on friendly terms with most western nations (first gulf war is a good example)
4) Saudi Arabia is the FUCKEN BIRTH PLACE of Islam, going to war with Saudi Arabia is pretty much the exact same as declaring all out war against over a billion people.
I seriously wondered why we didn't invade Saudi Arabia instead of Afghanistan or at the very least Iraq. Most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi Arabian, Saudi Arabia is ass-backwards with its laws and institutions and is incredibly corrupt. Afghanistan I can sorta understand, but if we had to invade another Middle-Eastern country, it should've been Saudi Arabia.
I'm with you on this.
-J.