![]() Police to enforce kids� curfew in southwestern OntarioLaw & Order | 207211 hits | May 09 9:17 pm | Posted by: wildrosegirl Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Who voted on this?
|
Great news, and I hope they fine the parents too..
Imagine if you read this in an article.
There would be outrage over such an article. We realize that we shouldn't deny freedom of movement to citizens based on mere suspicion that people of the same race/religion/socioeconomic class. Likewise we shouldn't prevent people from using public streets just because they are of a certain age.
What a completely asinine policy. What justification is there to deny the use of streets to an entire class of citizens?
Imagine if you read this in an article.
There would be outrage over such an article. We realize that we shouldn't deny freedom of movement to citizens based on mere suspicion that people of the same race/religion/socioeconomic class. Likewise we shouldn't prevent people from using public streets just because they are of a certain age.
Society regularly limits the rights and privlages of youth. There's nothing wrong with that.
Unless your having an affair, waiting for your dealer to show up or trying to sell some narcotics there is no imaginable reason the police can't just round everyone up.
Society regularly limits the rights and privlages of youth. There's nothing wrong with that.
We limit when kids can drink because it is harmful to growing bodies and needs a level of maturity to safely use. We limit when kids can drive because a certain level of maturity is need before operation a deadly machine. We limit when youth can buy firearms for the same reason. We limit who can smoke because it is addictive.
Notice the common theme, we limit what youth can do because of dangers. We shouldn't limit them from using public streets because someone they be committing, especially when freedom of movement is in the Charter.
It's true, there's no good reason for anyone to be out after midnight.
Unless your having an affair, waiting for your dealer to show up or trying to sell some narcotics there is no imaginable reason the police can't just round everyone up.
This past Friday I saw a 945pm showing of Ironman 2. The film ended at midnight and I had half an hour walk through downtown Kingston to get from the movie theater to my dorm room. Are you seriously suggesting that I should have been arrested for the "crime" of walking home past midnight?
Canada is a free country where freedom of movement is guaranteed in the constitution (something the Americans don't even have). It is inconsistent with Canadian values and freedoms to prevent citizens from using public streets. Not to mention the idea of arresting anyone out past midnight flies in the face of being innocent until proven guilty.
If anyone is going to institute a curfew it should be the parents.
I am joking but I'm also trying to show how frightening reasonable expanding a curfew like that to everyone would be.
While I don't disagree with the idea of curfewing kids, isn't this something that the parents should be enforcing rather than the cops?
I would say its a reaction to parents either not enforcing
or not being able to enforce some discipline on their kids.
Bit of a shame it had to come to this.