Toronto woman sues Rogers after her affair is exposed

Not sure about others but when I select this thread I get a picture of praying monks.
Story is at this link http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/crime/a ... ffair?bn=1

As for the story itself, add this twit to the list of "don't blame someone else because you got caught" She cheated, got busted got dumped, by both lovers, and has cemented her spot as a big loser. Well wha wha tough luck!

Can Rogers counter-sue her for being a two-timing, lying, cheating tramp? Or the third party for being a worthless, lying, cheating, piece of pond scum?

No matter what you think of her, how the hell can a company just put a contract into someone elses name???

They can't. I hope she wins, and gets genital herpes.

Interesting case and I think she has a legitimate action against Rogers. Forget the fact that she's a lying douchebag. Her private information was shared with another client and if that happened to me, I'd be pissed. To bring a successful tort action, you have to prove damages in court. While I think $600,000 is extreme (especially when there is a provincial cap on pain & suffering), I think she has suffered actual damages because of Rogers' failure to keep her private information private. If her allegations are true, Rogers SHOULD be hit with a significant punitive judgement.

I agree with you, Lemmy.

This is weird. I'm interested in this case, but I don't really care which way it goes. Rogers shouldn't have done that, but she kinda deserved it.

Why? Since when is it up to a company to bring out personal matters? Or to anyone but the the 3 involved?

I can't say I feel sorry for this woman one bit. Tough luck, tramp.

The whore got busted. I hope her husband gets everything!

well if she does win the husband should be getting most if not all that money.....called alimony bitch.

There seems to be information missing from the article. I heard about this story on the morning talk shows today, and according to them Rogers left a message at the residence informing that she was behind on her payments on the cell phone, which was in her maiden name. The husband called and asked Rogers to put everything on one universal bill. When he got the next bill he saw the hour long phone calls she was having on that cell phone with the same unrecognized number. That's how he found out.
So while Rogers dropped the ball by allowing the cell phone bill to be conglomerated into the other bills at the request of someone other than the account holder, IMHO the fault for the break up of the marriage squarely rests with the idiot woman (you know, the one who had the affair). Why would she leave her home phone number as the alternate contact number for that account? I would award her $1 dollar in compensation since she is legally in the right, however all her damages were caused by her.

absolutely right qball!!
boo hoo I screwed up, I cant take responsibility , so I'll sue sombody