 RCMP gun confiscations prompt legal fightMisc CDN | 206880 hits | May 18 9:09 am | Posted by: wildrosegirl  The recent confiscation of a formerly legal firearm has raised questions about how the RCMP inspects imported firearms and has forced a change of national firearms policy.Commentsview comments in forum You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
There's no need for a civilian to own an assault rifle anyways. Good riddance!
Maybe it's his hobby. Power to him.
So something that used to be legal, but is not legal anymore, should be condoned because the item that is illegal was purchased before it became illegal, right?
Hey, at least this time the owners are being reimburesed for their loss.
I don't have a problem with that, but automatic weapons don't belong in the hands of civilians.
There's no need for a civilian to own an assault rifle anyways. Good riddance!
Maybe it's his hobby. Power to him.
So if someone's hobby is crystal meth, then it's okay?
Hmmmm...
So something that used to be legal, but is not legal anymore, should be condoned because the item that is illegal was purchased before it became illegal, right?
Actually, the real issue was, the weapons were never physically examined for classification the first time around.
Hey, at least this time the owners are being reimburesed for their loss.
I don't have a problem with that, but automatic weapons don't belong in the hands of civilians.
Oh, I agree, I'm just saying this isn't some big police and government conspiracy to remove guns from lawful owners.
Hmmmm...
So something that used to be legal, but is not legal anymore, should be condoned because the item that is illegal was purchased before it became illegal, right?
Actually, the real issue was, the weapons were never physically examined for classification the first time around.
Which is not my problem.
There's no need for a civilian to own an assault rifle anyways. Good riddance!
If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.
There's no need for a civilian to own an assault rifle anyways. Good riddance!
Maybe it's his hobby. Power to him.
So if someone's hobby is crystal meth, then it's okay?
Or child porn?
Maybe it's his hobby. Power to him.
So if someone's hobby is crystal meth, then it's okay?
Or child porn?
Only if they already had it or did it before it became illegal.
So if someone's hobby is crystal meth, then it's okay?
Or child porn?
Ha Ha, are you kidding? You want to compare the sexual exploitation of children to a person owning a firearm? That's sad.