 Disabled B.C. girl left with dead mom for daysMisc CDN | 206547 hits | Nov 11 6:56 pm | Posted by: wildrosegirl  The brother of a 15-year-old disabled B.C. girl says he is shocked to learn she spent up to nine days in a mobile home with the body of her dead mother before being found.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
Yet another government program that needs a total and complete overhaul!
Always someone else's responsibility, right?
"Social services said, 'Thank you. We're going to do a survey within the next three to four days'," said Prentice. "They did their survey within two days and told us to, 'Get her back, or your mom's charging you with kidnapping.'"
Didn't read this did you? It seems he was concerned, acted upon it and was threatened with legal action for doing so.
And yes, I did read that, thank you for your fucked up assumptions again
If you are so concerned about your sister, how come she was alone with her dead mom for 9 days till a NEIGHBOUR found her, and not YOU??
Always someone else's responsibility, right?
They seemed to be concerned as they risked a kidnapping charge previously. Without knowing the family dynamics, it's a bit off to say they were unconcerned.
That was in July. He had to bring her back, and never checked on her?
And yes, I did read that, thank you for your fucked up assumptions again
Obviously the only thing fucked up is your English comprehension.
Brenda a bit off......noooooo. next you'll be saying the Pope is Catholic.
Oh well, if I had blamed "the system", my head would be bit off for that. Whatever.
It's hardly biting your head off to point out the fact that
A) They had shown plenty of previous concern
B) we don't know what the dynamics of the family are ie how close the brothers live to the mother and sister and what kind of access they had.
Exactly. So it is ok to blame the system without that knowledge, but not the brother...
Well, the article suggested the brother might live out of town when it said he was 'visiting' which would preclude him from seeing to his sister on a daily or weekly basis.
The system did chastize the brother when he removed his sister after a two day review which suggests there might be a problem with the system.
(We all know the system sucks, we all know we can't trust it to be in the best interest of the child, who obviously has needs that never were met)