 Cadavers exhibition prompts protest A downtown anatomical extravaganza is coming under fire with critics preparing to march to city hall armed with concerns about the human cadavers posed on Portage Avenue as part of Bodies: The Exhibition.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
"Premier relies solely on the representations of its Chinese partners and cannot independently verify that (the bodies) do not belong to persons executed while incarcerated," the disclaimer says.
I don't know what to think about this. Has it been discussed here recently?
He asked the bodies for consent.
Not answering is consent, isn't it?
That's always been my view when bringing drunk girls home.
Throwing up all over your lap is NOT consent.
Mans eternal obsession with the macarbe
Interesting how little outrage there is for this too isn't it?
"Premier relies solely on the representations of its Chinese partners and cannot independently verify that (the bodies) do not belong to persons executed while incarcerated," the disclaimer says.
I don't know what to think about this. Has it been discussed here recently?
I think it's highly likely some of them are exactly that, it's an ancient Chinese tradition. But how do you prove it.
I think it's highly likely some of them are exactly that, it's an ancient Chinese tradition. But how do you prove it.
I don't think you really have to. This company should have to prove consent at the very least. There is furious debate going on about the desecration of icons, but nobody cares about the desecration of these people. I think it is almost frightening that I can't find people who think this is abhorrent.
"Premier relies solely on the representations of its Chinese partners and cannot independently verify that (the bodies) do not belong to persons executed while incarcerated," the disclaimer says.
I don't know what to think about this. Has it been discussed here recently?
I think it's highly likely some of them are exactly that, it's an ancient Chinese tradition. But how do you prove it.
You look for missing organs.
I think it's highly likely some of them are exactly that, it's an ancient Chinese tradition. But how do you prove it.
I don't think you really have to. This company should have to prove consent at the very least. There is furious debate going on about the desecration of icons, but nobody cares about the desecration of these people. I think it is almost frightening that I can't find people who think this is abhorrent.
Well of course you should have to prove consent. In Canada. And really, if it came down to it, how hard would it be for China to fabricate that proof?
Well of course you should have to prove consent. In Canada. And really, if it came down to it, how hard would it be for China to fabricate that proof?
So why doesn't anybody care? When this "exhibit" opened, I spent 3 evenings trying to get signatures on a petition. Two people signed. They also said they were going to "go check it out".
Well of course you should have to prove consent. In Canada. And really, if it came down to it, how hard would it be for China to fabricate that proof?
So why doesn't anybody care? When this "exhibit" opened, I spent 3 evenings trying to get signatures on a petition. Two people signed. They also said they were going to "go check it out".
I would have signed it, if that's any consolation. I don't like how we gloss over China's reputation for the sake of trade.
This same exhibit was in Sacramento and one local reporter compared it to the "House of Wax" (of several movie versions) and how it was little more than the same story except that now no one was horrified by the thought of making waxen statues out of people.