news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Condos in northern Alta evacuated

Canadian Content
20705news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Condos in northern Alta evacuated


Business | 207046 hits | Mar 13 9:54 am | Posted by: wildrosegirl
15 Comment

At least two hundred Fort McMurray residents are without a home after an engineering report indicated their building complex is structurally unsound.

Comments

  1. by avatar martin14
    Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:22 pm
    Any reason this had to be done at midnight ?

    Seems.... kinda dumb to mess with people like this.

  2. by avatar wildrosegirl
    Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:26 pm
    My thoughts as well. I'm curious to hear how they justify that one.

  3. by avatar DrCaleb
    Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:46 pm
    The timing may be odd, but if I recall, those buildings went up in record time. It's not surprising then if they were built like crap.

  4. by avatar hurley_108
    Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:24 pm
    "martin14" said
    Any reason this had to be done at midnight ?

    Seems.... kinda dumb to mess with people like this.


    My guess: some engineer was up at 11 PM doing the work on this, concluded that the buildings were unsafe, and because engineers can go to jail if they knowingly allow people to live in an unsafe building, did his due diligence and immediately notified the authorities. Probably just a matter of when the flaw was discovered and how quickly action could be taken.

  5. by avatar 1Peg
    Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:28 pm
    Sounds like a pissing contest to me.....The building complex was structurally sound seven years ago, why not now? What has changed?

  6. by avatar DrCaleb
    Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:44 pm
    "1Peg" said
    Sounds like a pissing contest to me.....The building complex was structurally sound seven years ago, why not now? What has changed?


    From news reports, the walls no longer touch the foundation in some places, and floor joists also are hanging in mid air. The floors of several 1st floor apartments have recently separated from the walls, so they have spaces you can see in to the basement suite apartments.

    I'll bet $5 that the building was not sound 7 years ago, just the inspectors were incompetent.

  7. by avatar raydan
    Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:51 pm
    "hurley_108" said
    My guess: some engineer was up at 11 PM doing the work on this, concluded that the buildings were unsafe, and because engineers can go to jail if they knowingly allow people to live in an unsafe building, did his due diligence and immediately notified the authorities. Probably just a matter of when the flaw was discovered and how quickly action could be taken.

    My guess is that somebody wanted some overtime pay. :?

  8. by avatar 1Peg
    Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:01 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    Sounds like a pissing contest to me.....The building complex was structurally sound seven years ago, why not now? What has changed?


    From news reports, the walls no longer touch the foundation in some places, and floor joists also are hanging in mid air. The floors of several 1st floor apartments have recently separated from the walls, so they have spaces you can see in to the basement suite apartments.

    I'll bet $5 that the building was not sound 7 years ago, just the inspectors were incompetent.



    Apparently there is an ongoing court battle between the condo group and the developer over deficiencies in the buildings and the order came to evacuate at 4:30 Friday afternoon. Scary stuff to have buildings crumbling.

  9. by avatar Brenda
    Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:38 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    Sounds like a pissing contest to me.....The building complex was structurally sound seven years ago, why not now? What has changed?


    From news reports, the walls no longer touch the foundation in some places, and floor joists also are hanging in mid air. The floors of several 1st floor apartments have recently separated from the walls, so they have spaces you can see in to the basement suite apartments.

    I'll bet $5 that the building was not sound 7 years ago, just the inspectors were incompetent.
    Not just the inspectors. The construction company and their "Red Seal tradesmen" are not really deserving of their title.

    A building can not fall apart like that if it was built according to code.

  10. by avatar sandorski
    Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:51 pm
    Damn, not the place you want to be homeless at. Not sure what it's like right now, but Ft Macmurray is often very short on housing at the best of times.

  11. by avatar DrCaleb
    Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:12 pm
    "sandorski" said
    Ft Macmurray


    Fail. ;)

  12. by avatar sandorski
    Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:05 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    Ft Macmurray


    Fail. ;)

    Oops, indeed. :cry:

  13. by avatar Yogi
    Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:44 pm
    "Brenda" said
    Sounds like a pissing contest to me.....The building complex was structurally sound seven years ago, why not now? What has changed?


    From news reports, the walls no longer touch the foundation in some places, and floor joists also are hanging in mid air. The floors of several 1st floor apartments have recently separated from the walls, so they have spaces you can see in to the basement suite apartments.

    I'll bet $5 that the building was not sound 7 years ago, just the inspectors were incompetent.
    Not just the inspectors. The construction company and their "Red Seal tradesmen" are not really deserving of their title.
    A building can not fall apart like that if it was built according to code.


    A lack of knowledge is the basis for this^^ statement. You know better than that B! 'Red Seal' has nothing to do with this equation.
    'Journeymen' are to be on all construction sites supervising apprentices. This is up to the general contractor to make sure of. I have been on many sites, in Ft. Mac. as well as around Western Canada, and there is a serious lack of certified journeymen in all the trades. Consequently, and obviously wrong to do so, contractors hire 'whoever has the lowest price'!'Red Seal' means that the journeyman cares enough about their trade to take the initiative, time and 'personally incur the expense which they are never reimbursed for', for the training required to meet or exceed all provinces requirements. They have then the designation of 'Journeyman Consultant'. If 'Red Seals' had been working on this project, we wouldn't even be having this conversation!

  14. by avatar Brenda
    Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:47 pm
    Hence the " ... ".

    Red Seal means they wrote the exam, not that they care.

    I don't agree with your latest statement tho. NOBODY did their jobs, and you, just as I, do not know whether they were Red Seal tradesmen or not. It should NEVER EVER have been given the thumbs up. Not by the contractor, nor by the inspectors.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net