news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

One confirmed dead as Virgin Galactic SpaceShip

Canadian Content
20798news upnews down

One confirmed dead as Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo destroyed in test flight


Science | 207978 hits | Oct 31 11:55 am | Posted by: DrCaleb
3 Comment

First powered flight in nine months ends with fatal "anomaly,", cause unknown.

Comments

  1. by Regina  Gold Member
    Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:47 pm
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/virgin-gal ... -1.2819996

    Two now.

  2. by avatar Jabberwalker
    Fri Oct 31, 2014 11:22 pm
    What a shame. Space travel is VERY DANGEROUS and we should never forget the incredible risks that astronauts take every time that they climb on top of those mountains of explosives called "rockets".

  3. by avatar Public_Domain
    Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:47 am
    :|

  4. by avatar Winnipegger
    Sat Nov 01, 2014 12:11 pm
    No details. We don't know why. However, they had a problem scaling up the hybrid rocket form SpaceShipOne. It was a great innovation: solid rocket, but no oxidizer. Instead they blew nitrous oxide onto solid fuel.

    SpaceShipOne won the X-Prize in 2004. It used hydroxy-terminated polybutadiene (tire rubber) and nitrous oxide (laughing gas). Solid rocket motors, such as the ones used by the Shuttle, use the same rubber, but they add powdered aluminum for more heat, and ammonium perchlorate to generate oxygen. SRBs also have a tiny bit of iron oxide (rust) as a catalyst to ensure the the aluminum burns quickly and smoothly. But burning rubber generates gas that produces thrust. SpaceShipOne used the same rubber, but no additives. Instead nitrous oxide was the oxidzer. That self-pressurizes at room temperature, so no need for any fuel pumps. It was a realy simple system.

    For SpaceShipTwo they tried to use the same system. Scaled Composites designed and built both SpaceShipOne and SpaceShipTwo, but SpaceDev built the engine for SpaceShipOne. Sierra Nevada built the initial engine for SpaceShipTwo. They had a problem: ground tests showed the larger engine had stability problem at 20 seconds. Between 2005 and 2009, Scaled Composites themselves did numerous small scale tests of the engine. But between April 2009 and December 2012, ground tests were successful and they got FAA approval. In April 2013, they conducted the first test flight; but it didn't fly into space. However, further ground tests showed serious stability issues after 20 seconds. Investors and customers were getting ansy that no further test flights since April 2013. Virgin Galactic took over development of the engine in May 2014.

    They replaced rubber with nylon. Ground tests showed it was stable for full duration burn. And the plastic fuel was projected to have better performance (by several unspecified measures), so should propel the craft higher. They conducted ground tests between May and October of this year. Then this test flight. No details what happened. No air tunnel tests, no unmanned tests, just this test flight.

    Sources:



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net